Have you ever wondered why there are 31 days in August? There were 30 days in April, 31 days in May, 30 days in June and 31 days in July. Wouldn’t it make more sense to keep the sequence going, and have 30 days in August?
Well, that’s the way it was supposed to be. We need to go all the way back to the early days of the Roman Empire to find the reason for the change. Julius Caesar was responsible for modernizing the calendar. The Julian calendar, as it was known, honored that fact by having one of the months named after the famous Caesar. Hence, the month known as Quintilis was renamed July.
It was followed by Sextilis.
Julius’ successor was his nephew, Augustus, who became the first Roman Emperor. It was decided that he, too, should be honored by having a month named after him. For that reason Sextilis became August. Then it was noted that Julius had 31 days in his month, while Augustus only had 30. This had to be rectified! A day was stolen from February, which was already suffering by being the leap year month, and given to August. Then everybody was happy.
Scientifically, it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Sensible or not, we still have 31 days in August. That’s the way it is and we live with it, and probably no one cares a whit. After all, in the grand scheme of things, it makes no difference whether we say there are 30 days in that month or 31. It could be changed, but why bother?
On the other hand, there are things in life that could be changed and should be changed. Consider something like home canning. There are too many people who still can the way grandma canned — just because “that is the way you do it.”
Well, in recent years it has been found that low acid foods are better done in a pressure canner, that “oven canning” is not always safe, and that other, once standard practices, have the potential for problems. A potential for problems does not mean that a problem will always develop, but it could. Using a water bath canner for canning low acid foods, for instance, was once the standard, and the possibility of not killing all micro organisms may be very small, but the fact that it is now known that some contaminants might survive that canning process, does mean that we should now be considering other, safer alternatives.
The lesson, of course, is that every so often we should re-evaluate our methods. Is there a better and safer way of doing it? Is there an easier way of doing it? Is there a less expensive way of doing it?
When it comes to food preservation it could be very important to find answers to these questions. Yes, as with the calendar, the answers may end up being that we could make changes, but that it doesn’t really matter. Sometimes, though, we could make changes and it does matter.
Read Comments (2)